RE: Re: Power optimization and some (stupid?) LED questions
From: Demetrius Anger danger
waste.org
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:59:38 -0700
A! Sent via the Art & Robotics Group mailing list: arg-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx R! Use your "Reply All" to reply to the list, "Reply" for private response G! > I should mention that I don't think there is such a thing as a stupid > question. Okay! Somehow the LED - resistor question keeps confusing me and I know that I've asked this question of people and gotten answers but somehow it just doesn't stick or maybe just doesn't make sense in the first place so it doesn't stick because of that. My confusion about it is this: Okay if I had a 6V battery and just one LED and I know that I've got a 2V drop across the LED and I want 20mA running through the LED then I can say there's a 4V drop across the resistor so I can say V=IR R = V/I = 4V / 20mA = 200 Ohms But then say I put 2 LEDs in there. Then there's only a 2V drop across the resistor so R = 2V / 20mA = 100 Ohms But then say I put 3 LEDs in there. Then there's a 0V drop across the resistor so R = 0 / 20mA = 0 Ohms. So then I've got 3 LEDs in there put there's no way to calculate the current. What is the current? Is it huge? Like an ideal diode lets current flow as much as it wants right as long as the voltage across it is large enough so the current = infinite, but what is it in reality? Like can you calculate based on specs from the manufacturer? Somehow I thought if you did it so the voltage drop across the LEDs equaled the source voltage and there was no resistor the current would be running at the spec of the LED (20mA in this case) and that would be more optimal than if you had a resistor in there just bleeding off energy as heat. Is this a misconception? > I should also mention that I don't really have a proper answer > for you. I hope someone else can perhaps give you more > information. I will > only say, that if it was me doing the project I would wire the > batteries in > parallel, (because 6 volts is sufficient to operate an LED, and > batteries in > parallel will last longer than a single one as you know). Then with the > LED's I would certainly wire each LED with it's own resistor, and wire all > the LED-resistor groups in parallel. (In the event that only > one LED will > be on at a time, then all the LEDs can share a single resistor). I'm not > sure how long the LEDs will remain illuminated in this > configuration, but my > guess is longer than a week. I will probably do this if no one else says anything. I don't totally understand why though. Why would 2 6V batteries in parallel last longer than one 12V in series? Is it like if there's a bigger voltage drop those little electron people try to get to the other side harder or something? And why is it better to have them all in parallel? I guess I'm still stuck in the having resistors in there means there's power wasted idea. When you guess they would run longer than a week would that be only running at night or are you saying 24/7? If I don't have to make a dark-activated switch I be so stressed about getting that part to work. Although I will probably still try. I just got a bunch of light-cell and light-resistors to mess around with and have done some transistor / FET things so I think I can figure out something. Thanks alot for your help Sandor! -aaron A! R! messages saved at http://www.interaccess.org/arg/arg-list.html G! unsubscribe/help requests to mailto:Majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx