![]() |
|
Re: AID: [OT] PIC OSC Client
From: Ian Smith-Heisters heisters
0x09.com
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:12:33 -0700
: Sent via the Art Interface Device mailing list: aid@interaccess.org : Use your "Reply All" to reply to the list, "Reply" for private response GPL of course! That's great to hear that UDP is the standard, it removes a lot of variables. We're looking to use ethernet as the transport for UDP, with the hope that it'll also make it easy to add a WiFi Transceiver to make the gizmo wireless :) I'll post to this and other lists that might be interested when I have something to show for the effort. Cheers, Ian B. Bogart wrote: >Hey Ian, > >I've only even known OSC to work with UDP. I know in theory it works via >other protocols but I think UDP is the standard. (in PDs implimentation >for example). > >I don't think we've spent a lot of effort on this for AID yet. It has been >in the plans though!! Are you planning on releasing your work under the >GPL? What medium are you transporting UDP over? (ethernet?) > >Good luck! > >Ben > > > >>: Sent via the Art Interface Device mailing list: aid@interaccess.org >>: Use your "Reply All" to reply to the list, "Reply" for private response >> >>Please forgive me if this is not the right forum for this question, but >>I've been following AID for some time, and believe that it may be one of >>very few projects that has looked at implementing OSC on the Microchip >>PIC, citing mention of such a project at >>http://www.interaccess.org/aid/list/msg00502.html >> >>I'm currently preparing to implement a very simple OSC client for the >>PIC18F452, and I am wondering if some of you might have some advice. My >>current plan is to transport the OSC packets via UDP, as this will be >>much simpler than TCP/IP. I'm not up on the particulars of the UDP or >>TCP/IP implementation, as my colleague is handling that side of things. >>Would OSC work with UDP? At this point, my only goal is for the PIC to >>be able to send information regarding the states of various input pins, >>so I don't need the PIC to be able to receive instructions, though this >>project would serve as a basis for such in the future. Is there any work >>that has been done in this vein that you could point me towards? I'm >>going into this a bit blind, and would appreciate any tips or pointers >>about the road ahead. >> >>Thanks, >>Ian Smith-Heisters >> >>: messages saved at http://www.interaccess.org/aid/list >>: unsubscribe/help requests to mailto:Majordomo@interaccess.org >> >> >> > > > > : messages saved at http://www.interaccess.org/aid/list : unsubscribe/help requests to mailto:Majordomo@interaccess.org